Clay Aiken Responds to Phil Robertson’s Anti-Gay Comments

By on December 20, 2013

Duck Dynasty’s Phil Robertson has been causing a stir all week with his shocking homophobic comments, and now Clay Aiken, an openly gay singer, his sharing his opinion on the matter.

clayaikenEarlier this week, people were stunned when Robertson made anti-gay comments, comparing homosexuality to bestiality. Aiken was on Arsenio to respond:

“I think it certainly shows that we’ve got a long way to go when it comes to people being accepting and understanding. Homophobia, racism, all of it’s built out of fear, and if you grow up in an area like Louisiana and you’re not exposed to diversity, then you can be afraid of things.”

Aiken continues:

“I think the thing that frustrates me the most is there have been people who have come out today and said, ‘It’s free speech. It’s free speech,’ I would ask them if the person had said something about interracial marriage, or said, ‘We need to put all children with disabilities in institutions,’ would we still be saying, ‘Well, that’s free speech, we’re OK with that opinion’? And I think the answer is ‘No.'”

Aiken also added:

“There are certain things in society that we have become universally against: racism, obviously, is wrong. The treatment of people with disabilities is wrong. But homophobia is one thing that we are still a little bit accepting of in certain areas. I think it’s progress, we’ll get there. But times have changed enough and perceptions have changed enough in the time that I’ve even been in the public eye, that I think we’ve made a lot of progress.”

Aiken obviously makes some fantastic points, and while the majority of people will agree with him and are shocked at Robertson’s comments, there are still a small group of people who still support Robertson and what he believes.

What do you think of Aiken’s comments? Do you agree with him?




  1. Carole

    December 26, 2013 at 7:13 pm

    Pardon my error. Should have been coarse.

  2. Carole

    December 26, 2013 at 7:09 pm

    I think Clay was dead on with his comments. I happen to enjoy Duck Dynasty on occasion but could not help but view Phil in a different light after his comments. He could have said what he wanted to say without being so course and tacky and I would have respected him for it even though I disagreed with him BUT to make such a comparison was just plain wrong and I don’t really think the Constitution covers such hateful remarks.

  3. Danny

    December 20, 2013 at 10:31 pm

    The Constitution guarantees your right to free speech. It does not protect you from the backlash once you shoot your mouth off. Clay was absolutely correct that hate speech is hate speech whether it is racist, ageist, sexist or homophobic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *